On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. btrfs/ext4 volume on top of a ZFS zvol. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. Where “file-sparse” is the file name, and the number at the end is the size that can be set in bytes, megabytes, and so on. Built By the Slant team. Complementing the benchmarks from yesterday are some more results today with Bcachefs compared to EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and F2FS with testing being done from the same Intel M. This feature allows for increased capacity and reliability. Both. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation of. It has been tried and tested, it is no doubt a solid and stable filesystem. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. This is a significant difference: The Ext4 file system supports journaling, while Btrfs has a copy-on-write (CoW) feature. So I think you should have no strong preference, except to consider what you are familiar with and what is best documented. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is presented as a default file system, as well as it is faster than the btrfs when transferring files. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. The SATA 3. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. Considering. The Ext4 File System. My problem is that in some games when DXVK is running in Linux, stutters occur, although there are no such problems on Windows. sandoxe • 4 yr. freebird54 September 21, 2021, 2:58pm 10. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。 Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. There are two ways this can be done. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. . With not having the time to conduct the usual. XFS supports larger file sizes and. ext4 ファイルシステムは、2 32 個を超える inode をサポートしません。 XFS は inode を動的に割り当てます。It provides a basic Unix- like file system for Linux, using virtual directories to handle physical devices, and storing data in fixed-length blocks on the physical devices. XFS and ext4 now calculate a checksum on metadata and their journal files. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. Here is a quote from RHEL regarding XFS vs ext4. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. Block sub-allocation and Tail packing. doc_willis • 2 yr. Tenga en cuenta que el uso de inode32 no afecta a los inodos que ya están asignados con números de 64 bits. These included Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem (EXT4). It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. 15 or newer (Please the same OS using same activating services and same apps!)The snapshots do not take up any space. Ext4 and Btrfs Filesystems are pretty much well known for their performance in Linux environments. I'd like to take advantage of an OS switch to upgrade to BTRFS. El ext4 y xf. Ext3, or Ext4) to the Btrfs file system using the btrfs-convert tool. ZFS is open source, it isn't "owned" by Oracle. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. The logical path from Ext4 is to Btrfs. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. Find a motherboard with enough drive ports or real sata controllers to run all the drives. Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?Generally, would go with btrfs. Hi there, I‘m thinking of changing my filesystem from ext4 to btrfs, as I have read a lot of positive things about it online. Key Points: ZFS stands for Zettabyte filesystem. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 BTRFS is the latest file system we present, and began development in 2007 by Oracle Corporation as a replacement for EXT4. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. As mentioned above, when picking between Btrfs vs. In this Video we are going to cover Linux File System Types - Ext2,Ext3,Ext4,XFS,BTRFS | Linux File Systems Explained | Linux Tutorial for Beginners #linuxt. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. Ext4 comes up with some new and improved features such as: Extent-based. 0 File-System. And you might just as well use EXT4. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. 3 Likes. Both are good file systems. The ext4 file system records information about when a file was last accessed and there is a cost associated with recording it. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. jkool702. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. Ext4 se basa en una tecnología más antigua, por lo que carece de las características modernas del sistema de archivos que se encuentran en sistemas como E2FS y BtrFS. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. He Installed Linux and partitioned his partition in Ext4 but Hardly after a month he screwed. F2FS vs. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that. However, I was using the openSUSE's default partition layout, which is btrfs for / and xfs for /home. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. If it is only about reliability and you're in doubt, go with ext4, imho. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. The one they your distribution recommends. Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. It's fine otherwise, but if you ever think you might want to shrink your partition, use ext4 or btrfs instead. , power failure) could be acceptable. /etc/fstab /dev/sda5 / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1 Doing so breaks applications that rely on access time, see fstab#atime options for possible solutions. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. Conclusion: Last time I ran these tests, xfs and ext4 pulled very similar results, and both were miles ahead of btrfs. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. No swap because 16GB RAM is enough for me. It's stable and time-proven. Add to Chrome Add to Edge Add to Firefox Add to Opera Add to Brave Add to Safari. ZFS also has more options for caches and such things than EXT4. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. BTRFS. Bcachefs in its current state was benchmarked against EXT4/XFS/Btrfs/F2FS/ZFS with each file-system being tested with its default mount options and done using an Intel Optane 900p 280GB NVMe solid-state drive. • 2 yr. Considering that btrfs will be able to span over multiple hard drives, it's a good thing that it supports 16 times more drive space than ext4. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. Recommended for general use. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. The inode system creates a separate table on each. On that list, only xfs is older. Unix, etc. Con: rumor has it that it is slower than ext3, the fsync dataloss soap. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. This would be an interesting test. 하지만 리소스 문제나 호환성 등을 생각한다면 EXT4도 포기할 수 없죠. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server ships with different file systems from which to choose, including Btrfs, Ext4, Ext3, Ext2 and XFS. Thanks! In that case, your choice is simple. Considering switching from a mixture of XFS and ext4, but only to Tux3 once that's merged. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. For a while, MySQL (not Maria DB) had performance issues on XFS with default settings, but even that is a thing of the past. Language: Format: Red Hat Training. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: 8. Compared to classic RAID1, modern FS have two other advantages: - RAID1 is whole device. If you think that you need. Btrfs may be better for large servers. Next we will need to rebuild grub, first mount the EFI folder (in our case its /dev/sda1) mount -t auto /dev/sda1 /efi. zfs not. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. EXT4 Vs XFS. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. Then later, I was actually able to convert that from btrfs-raid10. I hear zfs is good too. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. I don't know anything about XFS (I thought unRaid was entirely btrfs before this thread) ZFS is pretty reliable and very mature. Offizieller Beitrag. the COW which saves alot of space and increases the speed. Also consider XFS, which works better for extremely large files. Distribution of one file system to several devices. 5. だが、Linux 5. ext4 if I don't care about the install. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. But as some users found out, automatic snapshot (at the time it was first released) ate disk space on single user installations. 00GHz (8 Cores) MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1. Because of that, the Ext4 file system is very stable. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. NTFS Benchmarks Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. Con: rumor has it that it is slower than ext3, the fsync dataloss soap. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Nowadays btrfs is very stable and the tools to recover from fs corruption have been getting much better as well. Diferenças básicas entre o Ext4 e o Btrfs. btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. ext3 is the most common format. Linux 5. A：EXT4是更高效高性能的系统，接下来依次是XFS,EXT3. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. ) TL, DR: All 3 major next gen CoW file systems have their advantages and drawbacks, and I figure integrating them into my workflow is the only way to fairly evaluate them see how they work for myself. That however would disable a lot of the Btrfs features. Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. 8 snapshot as of last week. 2 kernel. brown2green. Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: FreeBSD ZFS vs. to get a significantly faster result than xfs. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. Btrfs was developed specifically to facilitate quick administration and maintenance. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS File Systems Perhaps these types of file systems are strange or unknown to you, normal, since they are used in the environment of servers, NAS and Linux systems in general. And you might just as well use EXT4. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help. ZFS does have advantages for handling data corruption (due to data checksums and scrubbing) - but unless you're spreading the data between multiple disks, it will at most tell you "well, that file's corrupted, consider it gone now". This process have two main steps: 1. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation. BTRFS stands for “B tree File System,” and it is a next-generation filesystem designed specifically for Linux operating systems. The XFS File System. It utilizes a b+tree structure instead of the traditional linear layout found in most filesystems today, allowing it to better manage larger datasets more efficiently than other systems like ext4 or Xfs. Ext4 has been around for a while and is generally more reliable and backward compatible. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. It. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. I saw that Fedora is now using Btrfs filesystem by default. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. XFS doesn't have any RAID, while Btrfs RAID is not yet completely stable and is in its early days. SSD optimization. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. Januar 2020. XFS was more fragile, but the issue seems to be fixed. Hi, I think BTRFS is actually faster then ZFS on Linux. Hardwareseitig gibt es bei Btrfs jedoch Ausnahmen. With btrfs I got 130-160MB. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. e. As cotas XFS não são uma opção remountable. XFS vs. Short answer: under GNU/Linux, you should use a GNU/Linux native file system, such as ext4, XFS or btrfs, as your root partition, for stability and security. Many options exist for file systems including Ext2/3/4, Btrfs, etc. Regardless what I'm doing the maximum transferrate (write) is between 40-60MB on ZFS. It's a filesystem which resides entirely in your RAM. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. Agree, actually I have a bunch of freebsd for ZFS. WD & Windows vs. XFS is optimized for large file transfers and parallel I/O operations, while ext4 is optimized for general-purpose use with a focus on security. Ext4 specially without a journal and XFS are both extremely fast. 3. btrfs /dev/zd0p1 (which didn. The question is XFS vs EXT4. Using: - A full partition in a single 1TB or 2TB NVMe SSD. - Btrfs hỗ trợ tính năng pool trên ổ cứng. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. checksum verification on each file. Comparison of file archivers. Especially things that cause lots of file-internal fragementation like databases. Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. The question is XFS vs EXT4. Recommended for general use. On the other hand, if you need low latency random appends, this benchmark suggests you want xfs, especially on SMR. 7 - EXT4 vs. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. . Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. You can sometimes run into bugs and issues if your home directory is partitioned in XFS, BTRFS, or ZFS. Ext4 file system is the successor to Ext3, and the mainstream file system under Linux. 2. Ext4 is more mature, whereas Btrfs has features that should allow for greater resilience (and, in theory, should make it less susceptible to data corruption). g. Both file systems can recover from a power loss, but using Btrfs will not immunize you from them. showed that at the time the performance for the RAID setup was not able to compete with ext4 and ZFS. openZFS would be another great option, except for licensing issues. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. XFSI've drank the kool-aid and I both run btrfs on root, /home, and for a 1 TB data drive. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. Tùy chọn mặc. 5. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. ZFS likes eating RAM. Btrfs is always faster than ext4 when used with the nodatacow mount option. To recommend a suitable file system, I need to know the exact purpose of /tmp. 1. Phoronix: Linux 4. So I did two rounds: the. The first way is mkfs. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. g. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. There was some fun in getting it mounted, but this link set me straight finally! Other sites said to mkfs. ext4 vs NTFS. This was done from an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX system with ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME motherboard, 4 x 8GB DDR4-3200 memory, and. my nextcloud site). List of archive formats. EXT4は、Linuxベースのオペレーティングシステムのメインファイルシステムです。zfs or btrfs or ext4. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. User quotas for each shared folder. Key Btrfs features Perhaps the most important feature is the checksumming of all data. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!Reviews of EXT4, EXT3, XFS, BTRFS, and ZFS. Picking a filesystem is not really relevant on a Desktop computer. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. Both btrfs and zfs feel like the worst options considering their overhead. Já que muitos usuários Linux, que desejam experimentar o novo sistema, vêm do Ext4, faz sentido enumerar alguns pontos que realçam as diferenças entre os dois: O Ext4 ainda é a melhor escolha, no desktop do usuário comum — por ser mais rápido na transferência de arquivos e por ser mais madurobtrfs seems to work better for us than xfs, xfs slowed down after a few days, even with trims between bigger amounts of plots. g. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. EXT4 is just a file system, as NTFS is - it doesn't really do anything for a NAS and would require either hardware or software to add some flavor. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. I've used EX4, XFS, EXT4+LVM and now I'm under BTRFS, and I can tell you, TF2, CSGO, Factorio, KSP, etc, all perform the same under all of them. Snapshots. both have hidden sharp edges, work differently, and have different design philosophies in terms of the command line tools etc. ReiserFS is another filesystem common to linux systems, but with some ongoing codebase issues whereby it periodically tries to kill your wife. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. Softwareseitig werden die Dateisysteme ext4 und Btrfs generell ab Diskstation Manager (DSM) 6. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. So if you have a SSD and care about the wear of that then. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. There are several filesystems such as ext4, f2fs, btrfs. As I have mentioned earlier, snapshots are created with minimal size due to the use of copy-on-write. Btrfs is a big leap past ext4 and XFS because it supports features such as: Copy-on-write; Subvolumes, snapshots, and rollbacks; Online defragmentationEl tipo de archivo Btrfs admite un tamaño de partición de hasta 16 EIB (Exibyte). The ext4 file system is still fully supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and can be selected at installation. 2. Otherwise, I don't think you'd notice the performance difference. Using multiple drives of varying sizes created a luks1 encrypted ‘single’ data and dup meta volume. The btrfs backup multi-disk arrangement, of different disk sizes in single mode was for me a trial of btrfs. It was time to do my quarterly disaster recovery drill, which involves bootstrapping my entire system from scratch using my scripts and backups. Next lets modify our fstab to match something like this ( remember to change the file-system from ext4 to btrfs in the next column) nano /etc/fstab. ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. Users are encouraged to read the Btrfs article for more info. Just EXT4, yes. 2. Under Compile Bench, EXT4 was the fastest on all three drives followed by a mix of XFS and F2FS. ago. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Reasons why I use LVM/ext4: I'm used to it. 21 merge window (now known as Linux 5. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. I see that it says multiple btrfs snapshots are not supported. Linux vs. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. #6. I would reccomend btrfs only if you need the extra features that ext4 doesn't provide like compression or snapshots. Btrfs 與 EXT4 常見問題解答. And xfs. The only benefit of btrfs that I could find was marginally easier setup and the software license. Data integrity protection. oneiric: 996. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. The fastest for the SATA/USB tests was XFS followed quickly by EXT4 and then F2FS. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. XFS与Ext4性能比较. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. 0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see. だが、Linux 5. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. All of these Linux. F2FS vs. 2. There was obviously some caching / lack of committing to disk involved that led to faster performance while the Btrfs file-system was in line with real-world expectations out of the. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. There won't be any noticeable difference. Furthermore, the Ext4 is designed to be backward compatible. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. Fuck writes blocking reads. Complexity: btrfs is a more complex file system than ext4, and may require more advanced knowledge and expertise to manage and maintain. Now today I had a power outage on our office server and I discovered that one file on the JFS volume has been completely corrupted. If you don't need the features of btrfs, then stick to ext4. It’s an improved version of the older Ext3 file system that includes a lot of great features, including ones for Solid State Drives (SSDS). Abstract and Figures. EXT4 is better in the general case. The fourth generation File System of the Ext (Extended) file system family. EXT4 vs. Reasons why I avoided btrfs:Increased Performance of ext4 vs. Btrfs would be adding features you most likely don't need. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. ZFS certainly can provide higher levels of growth and resiliency vs ext4/xfs. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. On the NVMe SSD, the four-thread FS-Mark was the fastest on XFS followed by Btrfs. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs).